So far all we have had different judges taking steps at sentencing to incorporate the local rules. They have not included us in the process. We met with the acting PJ and, with our input, he is reviewing some language to incorporate the rules more uniformly.

I also have suggested that we review the rules.

Nathan

Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone

-------- Original message --------
From: "Dave R. Crowley" <drcrowley@centrecountypa.gov>
Date: 7/1/21 4:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: chiefdefenders@pdap.simplelists.com
Subject: [EXTERNAL] - Insane overreaction to Com v. Koger

CAUTION: This email originated from OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Use extreme caution viewing this email.

Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.

Any questions or concerns please contact the Help Desk 610-344-4357

Just a heads up to everyone.

This morning at sentencing we were required to explain on the record and sign off on and attest to the reasonableness of a three page list of supervision conditions (many of which were clearly unreasonable).

After being apprised that we were going to conflict every revocation the court started backpedaling fast.

This was sprung on us without notice or a paper trail.  There is a practice order in Huntington requiring pretty much the same thing.  So this may be coming to a jurisdiction near you.

Take care,
Dave

To unsubscribe from this list please go to http://www.simplelists.com/confirm.php?u=TwoRCF7nlok0c77fvtZFSvGe9PSHkBwO